Luis Bunuel and Salavdor Dali famously began their
influential Surrealist film Un Chien
Andalou with the slice of an eyeball, while the Russian Futurist filmmaker
Dziga Vertoz closed his operatic collage film Man With a Movie Camera by melding the human eye with the lens of a
movie camera. The opening frames of Jurassic
World confront the audience with an eyeball as well, but one that
represents a very different relationship to movies than those manifesto-fueled
avant-garde masterpieces of the late 1920's.
The opening optical confrontation presented by this box-office
record-breaking behemoth got me thinking about the ways in which all of these
films are very much invested in their sense of themselves as movies. Where Un Chien Andalou and Man With a Movie Camera are both exercises
in anti-narrative, privileging non-linearity and anti-realist camera trickery
over story, Jurassic World is a
post-narrative film, resigned to its repetitious story elements and
characterizations, and confined to having a conversation with itself, and us,
about its own nature as pure cinema product. In this way, Jurassic World is a perfect gauge for how the medium of film has
changed in the intervening 85+ years. It's also a perfect gauge for how the
movie industry has changed since the release of the original Jurassic Park.
Like the sullen, inoffensive baby dinosaurs depicted
in the film, sentenced to a life of having child after child ride them in
circles, Jurassic World is a tired
tourist attraction that is excessively aware of the tired gaze of its audience,
but even more aware of their gullibility as consumers. The opening scenes of the film are riddled
with dialogue that seem to be desperately reassuring the audience that this
entry will certainly have "more teeth," while simultaneously sounding
utterly hopeless about the fact the film will have any "bite" at all.
As Bryce Dallas Howard's corporate liaison Claire states early on to some
potential sponsors of the park: "No one's impressed by a dinosaur anymore."
What we have in this new entry is a film that looks right at the audience,
states that it's a failed product, and then laughs at us for having vaulted it
to untold box office success.
To be fair, like the character of young Gray (Ty
Simpkins), there are a lot of people out there who, simply put, are just into
dinosaurs. The history of cinema holds a long fascination with dinosaurs, from
the animated Gertie the Dinosaur
(1914), to The Lost World (1925), King Kong (1933), the pioneering
stop-action work of Ray Harryhausen, and on through the ever-evolving CGI work
of Industrial Light and Magic. Historically, the cinema has served as a magical
tourist destination to witness these extinct creatures. Jurassic World conflates this idea of cinema-as-tourism in numerous
ways throughout the film.
A few years before the release of the original Jurassic Park, John Urry published an
influential book in tourism studies called “The Tourist Gaze” which would
define our movie-going preoccupation with these giant reptiles as a
Collectivist Gaze--the same type of mass, pre-packaged tourist experience
depicted as the central location of the film. Tourists who flock to theme parks
are central to the Collectivist Gaze--you see them running in colorful,
multi-cultural, chaotic streams as the new, mutant products of this entry
easily pick them off. Tourists who stray from the Collectivist path, like
brothers Zach and Gray in their protective "eye-pod" deciding to go
off-roading, are travelling into the realm of what Urry would call the Romantic
Gazer, solitary and in search of the Authentic.
The Jurassic films of the past have allowed audiences
to travel these imagined borderlands of the gaze, but Jurassic World truly falls short when it comes to discovering
anything authentic. In fact, much of the film feels like it takes place in
"Meta-World," with the Gen-Y dinosaur monitor Lowery (Jake Johnson)
explaining how he got his Jurassic Park
T-shirt on e-bay, extolling the authenticity of the original; Claire's
exasperated comment about a potential "Verizon Wireless" sponsored
attraction; the vigorously infused product placement involving not only the
park's Margaritaville outlet, but a Jimmy Buffet-penned song on the soundtrack
to boot. Once again, our sense of ourselves as consumers is a primary concern
of Jurassic World, almost to an
extent that would make German theatre practitioner Bertolt Brecht take
interest, were it not so narrowly focused on capitalist gain. Brecht was a
pioneer of meta-theatrical techniques who was invested in continually reminding
his audience of their role as spectators, and the constructed aspects of
spectacle. Brecht saw this awareness as essential to liberating audiences from
the dark goals of propagandists and myth-makers after WWI. In Jurassic World, utilizing the main
attraction of the theme park as an antidote to war is a theme that echoes this
sentiment throughout. Yet, the film’s villain, Hoskins (Vincent D’Onofrio),
comes to a wholly uninspired end at the jaws of the raptors he has been
taunting and planning to exploit throughout; ultimately, his most relevant
moment comes when he kicks back in front of the monitors during the final
action sequences, takes a long draw from a cine-plex-sized Jurassic World soda cup and inquires: "You recordin' this
thing?” An unsubtle reminder of the
endless reproduction of these types of franchises, to be sure, but also a
moment that feels like the makers of Jurassic
World are just rubbing our noses in the proceedings late into the film.
With all this in mind, I want to read Jurassic
World--that is, the park itself--as the current movie industry, desperate in
its attempt to cross-breed any number of market-proven ideas, particularly of
the recycled variety. The immersive audience experiences of the park, from the
rolling gyro-scopes to the drop-down audience experience, all echo recent
attempts by the industry to try and offer more immersive cinema experiences to
a public that is less and less interested in going to movies. One central
character to this reading is Masrani (Irrfan Kahn). Dressed in what you might
call “Industry Couture,” it is perhaps no mistake that this freewheeling,
helicopter-piloting stakeholder’s nationality is the largest movie-producing
country in the world. His wonder at the new "Great White Hope"
creation reminds us again of our spectatorship, and the state of the movie
business. When Masrani first sees the creature, is he seeing the attraction, or
the audience for the attraction? Claire speaks of "measuring the animal's
emotional experience," to which Masrani replies: "You can see it in
their eyes.” Recent marketing research tools that track exactly where the
spectator's eyes are looking at any moment came to mind, as I stared again into
the eyes of the mutant beast. In reverse shot, we see the look in Masrani's
eyes reflect his excitement at this new advancement, and the potential profit.
No comments:
Post a Comment